Editorial Policies

The Archives of Biotechnology and Biomedicine operates under a clear set of editorial policies designed to uphold integrity, transparency, and accountability in scientific publishing. These policies guide authors, reviewers, and editors through every stage of the publication process and ensure that the journal’s practices align with international best-practice frameworks. Our commitment is to fairness, objectivity, and the advancement of science.

Peer Review Policy

All manuscripts submitted to the journal undergo a double-blind peer review. Authors’ identities are concealed from reviewers, and reviewer identities are concealed from authors, promoting impartiality and minimizing bias. Each manuscript is evaluated by at least two experts in the field, and in cases of conflicting reviews, a third reviewer or an editorial board member provides a final assessment.

Reviewers assess manuscripts on originality, scientific validity, methodological rigor, ethical compliance, and clarity of presentation. The editorial office monitors timeliness, ensuring that authors receive fair and constructive feedback within a reasonable timeframe.

Plagiarism and Research Integrity

The journal enforces a strict zero-tolerance policy on plagiarism and duplicate publication. All submissions are screened using plagiarism detection software prior to peer review. Manuscripts found to contain unacknowledged copying, data manipulation, or unethical conduct are rejected immediately and may lead to institutional notification. Authors are responsible for ensuring the originality of their work and for properly citing all sources.

Ethics in Human and Animal Research

Research involving human participants must conform to the principles of the Declaration of Helsinki and obtain approval from an appropriate ethics committee. For studies involving animals, authors must follow internationally recognized guidelines for animal welfare and secure institutional ethical approval. Authors must include statements of compliance in their manuscripts. Failure to provide documentation may result in rejection or withdrawal of published articles.

Conflict of Interest

Authors, editors, and reviewers must disclose any potential conflicts of interest that could influence their work. This includes financial relationships, personal connections, or institutional affiliations that may bias judgment. Conflicts are disclosed in published articles to maintain transparency and trust with readers.

Data Availability and Reproducibility

Authors are encouraged to deposit underlying datasets, code, and supplementary materials in recognized repositories whenever possible. Data availability statements should be included in manuscripts, specifying where data can be accessed and under what conditions. Sharing data promotes transparency, reproducibility, and broader utility of published research.

Authorship Criteria

Authorship is reserved for individuals who have made significant intellectual contributions to the conception, design, execution, or interpretation of a study. Contributors who do not meet authorship criteria should be acknowledged separately. Authors must collectively approve the final version of the manuscript and agree to be accountable for its accuracy and integrity.

Corrections, Retractions, and Withdrawals

The journal follows best-practice guidelines for corrections and retractions. If errors are identified post-publication, a correction notice is issued. In cases of serious ethical violations or unreliable findings, the journal may retract the article. Retraction notices are permanent, linked to the original work, and openly accessible. Authors may request withdrawal of submissions prior to acceptance; after acceptance, withdrawal is permitted only under exceptional circumstances and must be approved by the Editor-in-Chief.

Editorial Independence

Decisions regarding acceptance, revision, or rejection of manuscripts are made solely based on scholarly merit, free from commercial or political influence. Editors are bound by confidentiality, ensuring that submitted manuscripts are not disclosed or used outside the review process. The journal’s editorial policies are aligned with recommendations from the Committee on Publication Ethics (COPE), the International Committee of Medical Journal Editors (ICMJE), and the World Association of Medical Editors (WAME).

Advertising and Sponsorship

Advertising and sponsorship do not influence editorial decisions. Sponsored supplements, where accepted, are clearly labeled and undergo peer review consistent with regular submissions. Advertisers and sponsors have no control over content selection, peer review, or editorial judgments.

Open Access and Licensing

All content in the journal is published under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (CC BY 4.0). This policy ensures immediate, free access to published work and allows reuse, distribution, and reproduction provided proper attribution is given to the original authors. Authors retain copyright to their work while granting the journal rights to publish.

Appeals and Complaints

Authors who disagree with editorial decisions may submit an appeal with a detailed explanation. Appeals are reviewed by an independent editor or advisory board member not involved in the original decision. Complaints about editorial conduct, reviewer bias, or publication ethics are handled confidentially and in accordance with COPE procedures.

Reviewer Responsibilities

Reviewers are expected to evaluate manuscripts objectively, respect confidentiality, and declare conflicts of interest. Reviews should be constructive and delivered within the agreed timeframe. Reviewers who identify ethical concerns, methodological flaws, or potential misconduct must inform the editorial office immediately.

Author Responsibilities

Authors must ensure that their manuscripts are original, free from plagiarism, and not under consideration by another journal simultaneously. Duplicate submission is strictly prohibited. Authors must adhere to journal formatting requirements and promptly address reviewer comments. They are also responsible for ensuring accuracy of data, figures, and references.

Compliance with International Standards

The journal is committed to aligning with international guidelines for responsible publishing, including COPE’s Code of Conduct, ICMJE’s Recommendations for the Conduct, Reporting, Editing, and Publication of Scholarly Work in Medical Journals, and WAME’s ethical principles. By embedding these frameworks into editorial practice, we strengthen the trustworthiness and credibility of our content.