Abstract

Review Article

Redefining Biotechnology for the Global South: The Role of Synthetic Biology and Computational Tools

Raghvendra Pandey*

Published: 26 May, 2025 | Volume 9 - Issue 1 | Pages: 010-017

Biotechnology has always played an important role in tackling global concerns, particularly in the Global South, where socioeconomic gaps sometimes stymie scientific progress. Recent advances in synthetic biology and computational technologies have the potential to revolutionize biotechnology in these locations. Synthetic biology allows for the creation and manipulation of biological systems, with promise applications in healthcare, agriculture, and environmental control. Computational methods such as machine learning and artificial intelligence help to optimize synthetic biology processes, enabling innovations that are suited to local requirements. The combination of these cutting-edge technologies with traditional biotechnological techniques has the potential to dramatically improve the Global South's ability to solve issues such as disease outbreaks, food security, and sustainable development. This abstract outline the critical intersections of synthetic biology and computational advancements and their potential to empower the Global South, highlighting the need for supportive policies and capacity-building initiatives to maximize their impact.

Read Full Article HTML DOI: 10.29328/journal.abb.1001044 Cite this Article Read Full Article PDF

Keywords:

Biotechnology; Global south; Synthetic biology; Computational tools; Machine learning; Artificial intelligence; Sustainable development

References

  1. Frew SE, Liu VY, Singer PA. A business plan to help the “Global South” in its fight against neglected diseases. Health Aff (Millwood). 2009 Nov-Dec;28(6):1760-73. Available from: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/19887417/
  2. Nguyen BD, Ly BTT. Current research, challenges, and perspectives of biotechnology: An overview. Viet J Agric Sci. 2019;1(2):187–199. Available from: https://doi.org/10.31817/VJAS.2018.1.2.09
  3. Okonko IO, Olabode OP, Okeleji OS. The role of biotechnology in the socio-economic advancement and national development: An overview. Afr J Biotechnol. 2006;5(23):2354–2366. Available from: https://www.ajol.info/index.php/ajb/article/view/56009
  4. Falkner R, Gupta A. The limits of regulatory convergence: Globalization and GMO politics in the South. Int Environ Agreements. 2009;9(2):113–133. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10784-009-9094-x
  5. Garner K. Principles of synthetic biology. Essays Biochem. 2021;65(5):791–811. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1042/EBC20200059
  6. Murukan AB, Jabbar A, Ramesh A, Melge AR, Melethadathil N, Suravajhala P, Suravajhala R. Synthetic biology. In: Encyclopedia of Bioinformatics and Computational Biology (Second Edition). Volume 4. 2025. p. 479-490. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1016/b978-0-323-95502-7.00055-5
  7. Gordon HC. Introduction to synthetic biology. In: Synthetic Biology. Singapore: Springer; 2023. p. 1–22. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-99-2460-8_1
  8. Guha S, Talukdar J, Karmakar A, Goswami S, Kumar A, Dhar R, Karmakar S. Synthetic biology: The new era. Asian J Med Sci. 2022;13(4):200–203. Available from: https://doi.org/10.3126/ajms.v13i4.43880
  9. Ilyas H, Afzal A, Abbas Z, Noor S, Ullah I, Rafique RS, Abbas Z, Ishaq MUBM. Commands of synthetic biology to modernize and re-design the biological systems. Adv Life Sci. 2024;11(3). Available from: https://doi.org/10.62940/als.v11i3.2658
  10. Nandan R, Srinivasan RB, Soumya C. Synthetic biology. IIP Series. 2024. p. 70–82. Available from: https://doi.org/10.58532/v3bjbt8p2ch3
  11. Liu AP, Appel EA, Ashby PD, Baker BM, Franco E, Gu L, et al. The living interface between synthetic biology and biomaterial design. Nat Mater. 2022 Apr;21(4):390–397. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41563-022-01231-3
  12. Cheng Y, Bi X, Xu Y, Liu Y, Li J, Du G, et al. Machine learning for metabolic pathway optimization: A review. Comput Struct Biotechnol J. 2023;21:2381–2393. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.csbj.2023.03.045
  13. Liu Z, Wang J, Nielsen J. Yeast synthetic biology advances biofuel production. Curr Opin Microbiol. 2022;65:33–39. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mib.2021.10.010
  14. Jumper J, Evans R, Pritzel A, Green T, Figurnov M, Ronneberger O, et al. Highly accurate protein structure prediction with AlphaFold. Nature. 2021 Aug;596(7873):583–589. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41586-021-03819-2
  15. Marcu ŞB, Tăbîrcă S, Tangney M. An overview of AlphaFold's breakthrough. Front Artif Intell. 2022;5:875587. Available from: https://doi.org/10.3389/frai.2022.875587
  16. Merzbacher C, Oyarzún DA. Applications of artificial intelligence and machine learning in dynamic pathway engineering. Biochem Soc Trans. 2023;51(5):1871–1879. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1042/BST20221542
  17. Eslami M, Adler A, Caceres RS, Dunn JG, Kelley-Loughnane N, Varaljay VA, et al. Artificial intelligence for synthetic biology. Commun ACM. 2022;65(5):88–97. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1145/3500922
  18. Helmy M, Smith D, Selvarajoo K. Systems biology approaches integrated with artificial intelligence for optimized metabolic engineering. Metab Eng Commun. 2020;11:e00149. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mec.2020.e00149
  19. García Martín H, Mazurenko S, Zhao H. Special issue on artificial intelligence for synthetic biology. ACS Synth Biol. 2024;13(2):408–410. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1021/acssynbio.3c00760
  20. Bhardwaj A, Kishore S, Pandey DK. Artificial intelligence in biological sciences. Life (Basel). 2022;12(9):1430. Available from: https://doi.org/10.3390/life12091430
  21. Owuondo J. Fostering educational development and innovation in the Global South: Incentivizing research and development (R&D). Int J Res Sci Innov. [date unknown]; Available from: https://doi.org/10.51244/ijrsi.2023.101018
  22. Casadella V. Systèmes d’innovation du Sud, transfert technologique et capacités d’apprentissage [Innovation systems from the South, technological transfer and learning capabilities]. Res Pap Econ. 2014; Available from: https://ideas.repec.org/p/rii/rridoc/38.html
  23. Owuondo J. Fostering financial inclusion and education access in the Global South: Collaborative stratagem. Int J Latest Technol Eng Manag Appl Sci. 2023;12(10):34–40. Available from: https://doi.org/10.51583/ijltemas.2023.121005
  24. Mateko FM. Opportunities in emerging technologies for Southern Africa: How the Global South should adopt to take advantage? Electron J Inf Syst Dev Ctries. 2024; Available from: https://doi.org/10.1002/isd2.12321
  25. Manduva VC. Unlocking growth potential at the intersection of AI, robotics, and synthetic biology. Int J Mod Comput. 2023;6(1):53–63. Available from: https://yuktabpublisher.com/index.php/IJMC/article/view/123
  26. Smith S, Korvink JG, Mager D, Land K. The potential of paper-based diagnostics to meet the ASSURED criteria. RSC Adv. 2018;8(59):34012–34034. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1039/C8RA06132G
  27. Hristov DR, Rodriguez-Quijada C, Gomez-Marquez J, Hamad-Schifferli K. Designing paper-based immunoassays for biomedical applications. Sensors (Basel). 2019;19(3):554. Available from: https://doi.org/10.3390/S19030554
  28. Louart S, Hedible GB, Ridde V. Assessing the acceptability of technological health innovations in sub-Saharan Africa: A scoping review and a best fit framework synthesis. BMC Health Serv Res. 2023;23:Article 930. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1186/s12913-023-09897-4
  29. Ahlawat U, Naruka A, Changdeo WB, Rehsawla R, Sansanwal R, Mishra R, et al. A review of cutting-edge biotechnological solutions for next-generation farming. J Exp Agric Int. 2024;46(7):687–704. Available from: https://doi.org/10.9734/jeai/2024/v46i72671
  30. De Haro LP. Biosecurity in the age of synthetic biology. Boca Raton (FL): CRC Press; 2024. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1201/9781003423171
  31. Linares Salgado JE. The promises of synthetic biology: New bioartefacts and their ethical and societal consequences. In: Synthetic Biology and Morality. Cham: Springer; 2018;179–194. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-71958-0_13
  32. Jamil SAB. Ethics in synthetic biology: Exacerbated misconceptions of the nature of man and cosmology. Asian Bioeth Rev. 2015;7(3):331–337. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1353/asb.2015.0022
  33. Roberts AJ, Thizy D. Articulating ethical principles guiding Target Malaria’s engagement strategy. Malar J. 2022;21(1):1–8. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1186/s12936-022-04062-4
  34. Kormos A, Lanzaro GC, Bier E, da Silva Santos V, Nazaré LC, Pinto J, et al. Ethical considerations for gene drive: Challenges of balancing inclusion, power and perspectives. Front Bioeng Biotechnol. 2022;10:826727. Available from: https://doi.org/10.3389/fbioe.2022.826727
  35. Kumar S. India’s first GM food crop held up by lawsuit. Nature. 2017;541(7637):267–268. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1038/541267A
  36. Reidpath DD, Allotey P. Ethical considerations in the global deployment of synthetic biology. Glob Bioeth. 2019;30(1):1–14.
  37. Peccoud J. Synthetic biology: Fostering the cyber-biological revolution. Synth Biol. 2016;1(1). Available from: https://doi.org/10.1093/synbio/ysw001
  38. Kiran BR, Prasad MNV, Mohan SV. Synthetic biology: An emerging field for developing economies. In: Biotechnology for Sustainable Development. Amsterdam: Elsevier; 2024;767–787. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1016/b978-0-443-16120-9.00013-3
  39. Cózar Escalante JM. La biología sintética y sus promesas por cumplir. Isegoría. 2016;55:485–501. Available from: https://doi.org/10.3989/ISEGORIA.2016.055.05
  40. Coenen C, Hennen L, Link H. The ethics of synthetic biology: Contours of an emerging discourse. TATuP – Z Technikfolgenabschätzung Theorie Prax. 2009;18(2):82–87. Available from: https://doi.org/10.14512/TATUP.18.2.82
  41. Shetty RP, Endy D, Knight TF. Engineering BioBrick vectors from BioBrick parts. J Biol Eng. 2008;2(1):5. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1186/1754-1611-2-5
  42. Silva JP, Bragança J. Synthetic biology: A perspective on the development and future of genetic circuit design. Biotechnol Adv. 2021;49:107733. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biotechadv.2021.107733
  43. Singh BP, Thakur IS, Gupta R. Biotechnological interventions and their relevance in the Global South. Curr Opin Environ Sci Health. 2022;27:100343. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.coesh.2022.100343
  44. Taye M, Reta D. Synthetic biology: Future opportunities for African bioeconomy. Afr J Biotechnol. 2023;22(4):109–118. Available from: https://doi.org/10.5897/AJB2023.17635
  45. Taylor CR, Schulze TG. Synthetic biology: Applications and regulatory perspectives. Nat Rev Genet. 2021;22:523–535. [No DOI provided]
  46. Venter JC. What is life? A 21st century perspective. Science. 2010;329(5997):1177–1178. [No DOI provided]
  47. Way JC, Collins JJ, Keasling JD, Silver PA. Integrating biological redesign: Where synthetic biology came from and where it needs to go. Cell. 2014;157(1):151–161. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cell.2014.02.039
  48. Yadav VG, De Mey M, Lim CG, Ajikumar PK, Stephanopoulos G. The future of metabolic engineering and synthetic biology: Towards a systematic practice. Metab Eng. 2012;14(3):233–241. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ymben.2012.02.001

Figures:

Figure 1

Figure 1

Figure 1

Figure 2

Figure 1

Figure 3

Similar Articles

Recently Viewed

Read More

Most Viewed

Read More

Help ?